skip to primary navigationskip to content

Language Sciences Research Symposium for early-careers researchers

Presenting work by early-careers researchers at the University of Cambridge
When Jun 19, 2018
from 01:30 PM to 07:30 PM
Where Cavonius Centre, Gonville & Caius College
Contact Name
Add event to calendar vCal

This half-day research symposium showcases the work of early-career researchers and complements the Language Sciences Annual Symposium on 13 November. 

Open to all language sciences researchers at the University of Cambridge, and supported by Cambridge Language Sciences IRC.


Registration & coffee

13.25 Welcome (Dr Andrew Caines)
13.30 Dr Anastasia Klimovich-Smith (Centre for Speech, Language, and the Brain)
14.00 Heidi Solberg-Økland (MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit)

Dr Paul Nulty (CRASSH)


Poster exhibition & refreshment break

16.00 Dr Dieuwerke (Dee) Rutgers (Faculty of Education & MEITS project)
16.30 Alexander Kuhnle (Dept. of Computer Science and Technology)
17.00 Dr Ana Pérez (Linguistics, Modern & Medieval Languages)

Closing remarks

17.45-19.30 Drinks & canapés

small register here.jpg 


Domain-general vs. domain-specific in spoken word and phrase recognition (Anastasia Klimovich-Smith)

Language comprehension invokes cortical computations that have been broadly separated into two camps: domain-general, i.e. those that support processing that is not specifically linguistic in nature; and domain-specific, i.e. those that are uniquely linked to aspects of linguistic processing. Critically it is yet underdetermined whether such strict computational dichotomy is valid and if so, what cortical networks support what computations.

Here we present cross-linguistic evidence from two fMRI studies, one in Russian and another in English. Cortical activity was recorded as participants listened to spoken utterances varying in the degree of their domain-general or domain-specific complexity. To assess which areas of the bilateral frontotemporal language processing network predominantly support domain-general or domain-specific computations, we used a variety of statistical techniques - univariate subtractions, connectivity measurements, regression and multivariate analyses. Results from the Russian study show that the left frontotemporal network supports demands of combined domain-general and domain-specific complexity, routinely present in morphologically complex Russian words. Results from the English study show increased bilateral frontotemporal connectivity for domain-general aspects of complex word processing. The combined results imply functional versatility of language-processing networks in their adaptation for the demands posed by different languages.

Perceiving audiovisual speech: Coordination of neural oscillations with auditory and visual speech cues (Heidi Solberg-Økland)

Seeing the face of the speaker aids speech comprehension when the acoustic speech signal is degraded. This visual enhancement is well-known, but neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Furthermore, many studies (ours included) find that the visual enhancement effect is highly variable: some people benefit more from visual speech cues than others We address both of these issues and ask: How does the coordination of neural oscillations with auditory and visual speech cues support comprehension of acoustically degraded speech in different people?

Phase coherence between quasi-rhythmic components of both acoustic and visual speech is emerging as a potential mechanism by which speech perception might occur in the brain (e.g. Peelle & Davis, 2012; Park, Kayser, Thut & Gross, 2016). Previous studies have shown that low frequency neural oscillations show significant phase coherence with both the acoustic speech envelope and its visual counterpart, lip aperture. Using coherence as an index for neural speech processing, we investigate (a) whether neural coherence with the speech envelope and/or lip aperture changes with differences in acoustic clarity and the presence or absence of visual speech and, (b) how individual differences in the use of visual information are reflected in coherence between visual speech and cortical areas involved (audio)visual speech processing.

Participants (N=14) in our M/EEG study watched videos of a speaker saying everyday English sentences where the audio has been noise-vocoded to produce varying degrees of intelligibility. Audiovisual (AV), auditory-only (AO, neutral face) and visual-only (VO, no sound) trials were presented in pseudorandom order, and participants verbally reported the words they could perceive on each trial. We recorded participants’ responses and calculate the percentage of words that matched the target sentence (word report). The talk will present the behavioural results as well as preliminary MEG coherence results.

Semantic Network Analysis of Contested Political Concepts (Dr Paul Nulty)

Political concepts are often characterised as "essentially contested" in the sense that their essential meanings are necessarily in dispute when we deploy them in adversarial political discourse. When tasked with pinning down an elusive word meaning, modern lexicographers, computational linguists, and natural language engineers usually turn to a descriptive analysis of the term's use in context, often looking for statistical patterns of syntactic or document-based word co-occurrence in large collections of digital text. This talk presents an application of the tools of statistical corpus semantics to the problem of delineating the various complex, multi-faceted, and value-laden meanings of abstract political concepts. As an example, comparisons of the lexical-semantic structure of political terms from libertarian and socialist online communities are presented. Network analysis methods including community-detection and measures of centrality are used to compare and contrast the terms of particular importance to the structure of word association networks from different ideologies. 


Putting CLIL into practice in multilingual primary education settings: Towards joint conceptualisations and successful implementations (Dr Dieuwerke Rutgers)

In response to continued internationalisation, the number of primary schools in Europe offering early foreign language (FL) programmes, particularly with English, has risen sharply in recent years. Increasingly, schools are adopting a content-and-language-integrated or CLIL approach to FL teaching, whereby the teaching of subject content (e.g. science) and language (e.g. English) occur simultaneously. This places new demands on primary school teachers associated with the integration of content and language didactics.

One the one hand, this relates to teachers’ understanding and implementation of general CLIL principles and procedures, which continues to be subject of debate and research, particularly in terms of the conceptualisation of integration within CLIL (Nikula et al., 2016). On the other hand, this relates to the implementation of CLIL procedures specific to the (developmental) age group that primary teachers teach, particularly as CLIL has so far been more widely established and researched at the secondary level. Moreover, globalisation has also contributed to an increase in the cultural and linguistic diversity of classrooms. This poses further challenges for teachers associated with the incorporation of more multilingual and culturally-inclusive approaches to CLIL, and the successful integration of minority children.

Thus, primary schools and teachers aiming to successfully implement CLIL lessons not only face the challenge of translating secondary CLIL research and practice to the primary context, but also of having to respond adequately and effectively to the rapidly changing linguistic landscape in their classrooms, in relation to both of which established CLIL theory and practice only provides partial answers. In this talk, I will discuss ongoing research on teacher professionalisation for primary CLIL in the Netherlands, presenting findings from an initial research phase dedicated to identifying the principles of and current gaps in CLIL teaching in multilingual primary settings, as well as implications and current directions.  

“Unit-testing" deep learning with synthetic data for more informative evaluation (Alexander Kuhnle)

Deep neural networks, in combination with huge datasets, have transformed the field of Natural Language Processing. It is common practice nowadays to rely on standard benchmarks to investigate and compare system performance. However, I will argue by example of the visual question-answering task that this led to a wide range of systems with little indication of their strengths and weaknesses. One reason is that datasets are often not targeted at specific phenomena but at rather general abilities, like multimodal reasoning. Moreover, many datasets have been shown to contain various biases and correlations which systems use to obtain good performance without actually learning anything interesting. Next, I will present a complementary evaluation approach based on automatically generated abstract data, which makes it possible to tailor the evaluation to a model's specific improvements and investigate its behaviour in detail. Compared to real-world datasets, which act as application benchmarks, such synthetic data is more akin to unit-testing: defined on an abstract level and targeted at a specific capability. Finally, I will discuss some common reservations against synthetic data in NLP and emphasise its potential relevance particularly in the context of deep learning.

Multisensory semantic integration in inferential comprehension (Dr Ana Pérez)

Although language comprehension is usually multimodal (e.g., listening to speech while observing body gestures), only few studies have investigated the role of multisensory semantic integration in language processing (Willems, Özyürek, & Hagoort, 2009), where, in general, multisensory integration of semantically consistent stimuli is facilitated, whereas it is disrupted with semantically inconsistent stimuli. In the present study, twenty-eight young adults (M age= 21.54) listened to short stories prompting an inference (e.g., “bear”). Subsequently, they were visually presented with either a consistent picture (“bear”) or inconsistent but plausible picture (“penguin”). A final, auditorily-presented sentence was either the expected or the unexpected target word (“bear” vs. “penguin”). Preliminary results show electrophysiological differences in both the picture and target word, indicating difficulty to integrate auditory information that failed to match visual information that agreed with the original interpretation. Our behavioural results (accuracy in a final question) confirmed participants’ comprehension has been disrupted after the presentation of multisensory stimuli that were semantically inconsistent. 


Language choice for emotional inner speech among international students in the UK: an acculturation perspective (Wing Wu, Faculty of Education)

Implicit learning and production of novel prepositions (Giulia Boloventa, Theoretical & Applied Linguistics)
How clever are the models exhibiting "super-human" performance on the VQA datasets? (Alexander Kuhnle, Ann Copestake, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology)
Italian L1-attrition (Alexander Allan Cairncross, Theoretical & Applied Linguistics)
Adversarial post-specialisation of word embeddings (Edoardo Maria Ponti, Theoretical & Applied Linguistics)
Constructing an ideal L3 self: a classroom intervention for L3 learners in China (Tianyi Wang, Faculty of Education)
Subject to constraints: computational semantics and the syntax of arguments in Ancient Greek (Rachel Grewcock, Faculty of Classics)
“He sounded like a person of colour” – An explorative case study of secondary Austrian EFL learners’ perceptions of postcolonial Englishes (Julia Jakob, Faculty of Education)
Understanding language teacher cognition: critical reflection as an agent of change (Edsoulla Chung, Faculty of Education)
The complex construction of multilingual identity: exploring the dynamics between self and context in the process of third language acquisition in four European sites. (Harper Staples, Faculty of Education)

Predictive neural mechanisms in spoken word recognition and learning (Yingcan Wang, Becky Gilbert, Rik Henson, Matt Davies; MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit)

Flexible meaning: the neuromodulation of noun meaning by a prior verb (Bingjiang Lyu, Alex Clarke, Hun Choi, Lorraine K. Tyler; Centre for Speech, Language & the Brain)

Cambridge Language Sciences is a virtual centre for language researchers at the University of Cambridge. 

Our mission is

  • to connect a diverse research community
  • to create increased opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration
  • to advance knowledge through the cross-fertilisation of ideas
  • to develop external partnerships
  • to equip the next generation of researchers with the knowledge, experience and skills for interdisciplinary research.

Click here to join us or to .

Sign up for the language sciences mailing list.

Download our newsletter here.

Upcoming events

2018 Wheeler Lecture – Professor Stephen Pulman: Language, learning and creativity

May 30, 2018

William Gates Building, Lecture Theatre 1

Cambridge PhD Clinic: How to track the impact of your publications

Jun 07, 2018

Sociology Seminar Room (1st floor), Dept. of Sociology, Free School Lane

Language Sciences Research Symposium for early-careers researchers

Jun 19, 2018

Cavonius Centre, Gonville & Caius College

Previous events

Upcoming events